The Scope Of Remediating Municipal Drinking Water Facilities Will Be Staggering

Removing AFFF PFAS forever chemicals from local environments presents a formidable challenge

Tuesday, March 19, 2024 - The imposition of PFAS forever chemical remediation costs onto consumers underscores the urgency of holding the companies responsible for PFAS contamination financially accountable. Unless these corporations are compelled to assume responsibility for the consequences of their actions, affected communities may bear the brunt of the financial burden associated with PFAS remediation. The prospect of passing on these exorbitant costs to consumers further underscores the need for swift and decisive action to ensure that those responsible for perpetuating PFAS contamination are held liable for the financial ramifications of their actions. Thousands of AFFF lawsuits seek to hold the makers of AFFF firefighting foam financially accountable for the damage to human health they have caused.

To give one an idea as to the scope and complexity of what must be done to clean up PFAS chemical environmental contamination just look at the major steps that must be taken. Once the local soil has been contaminated with PFAS forever chemicals, deadly toxins can leach into the underlying water table for decades. Several steps are necessary to address municipal water contamination. The first is to shut down municipal water treatment facilities that test greater than 60 parts per trillion (PPT) for PFAS chemicals. Most municipal water treatment plants like the one in Stuart Florida, have tested more than 1000 PPT. The next step is to stop the use of AFFF firefighting foam and other sources of the contaminant. Once that is done the next step is to physically remove billions of metric tons of contaminated soil and replace it with clean soil. Next, the water treatment facility must be cleaned rid of the toxins, and reopened. Unfortunately, polluting the soil may persist due to PFAS-contaminated rainwater re-polluting the area. AFFF foam lawsuits filed against major manufacturers of PFAS, such as 3M and DuPont, alongside several other prominent producers of AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam), are promising in addressing the financial strain associated with PFAS remediation efforts. These legal actions represent potential avenues for financial relief, as they seek accountability from the entities that are allegedly responsible for the widespread contamination of local environments with PFAS compounds. By holding these corporations accountable for their actions, affected communities may gain access to financial resources necessary for mitigating the adverse effects of PFAS contamination.

According to an article published on Grist.org, the projected costs associated with eliminating PFAS from water supplies are staggering, far surpassing what cities, utilities, and average consumers can feasibly afford. Initial estimations indicate that the financial burden of filtering forever chemicals out of America's drinking water could exceed a staggering $3.8 billion annually. Such astronomical costs pose significant challenges to the financial sustainability of local utilities and municipalities, potentially necessitating substantial increases in consumer water bills to offset the expenses incurred in PFAS remediation efforts. The imposition of these costs onto consumers underscores the urgency of holding the companies responsible for PFAS contamination financially accountable. Unless these corporations are compelled to assume responsibility for the consequences of their actions, affected communities may bear the brunt of the financial burden associated with PFAS remediation. The prospect of passing on these exorbitant costs to consumers further underscores the need for swift and decisive action to ensure that those responsible for perpetuating PFAS contamination are held liable for the financial ramifications of their actions.

Information provided by AFFFLawsuitCenter.com, a website devoted to providing news about AFFF and PFAS cancer, lymphoma and leukaemia claims, including a free no-cost, no-obligation AFFF Lawsuit Claim.