Safer Alternatives to AF Firefighting Foam for Military Fire Suppression

High-pressure water systems and gel-based suppressants could replace firefighting foam and reduce environmental impact

Sunday, August 27, 2023 - The use of AF firefighting foam by the military has raised significant environmental and health concerns. The foam contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are persistent synthetic chemicals known to have adverse effects on both ecosystems and human health. Rainwater in every town in the United States has been contaminated by AF firefighting foam and the improper disposal of certain consumer products containing PFAS forever chemicals and is now deemed unsafe to drink. PFAS forever chemicals are found in such consumer items as Teflon nonstick cookware, Gortex waterproof clothing, and Scotchgard stain-resistant drapery and upholstery. Moreover, carcinogenic PFAS forever chemicals are found in Aqueous Film film-forming foam (AFFF) that is used at most military air stations and commercial airports. According to a chilling new study published recently by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), "The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in June issued nationwide health advisories for four PFAS chemicals commonly found in drinking water. Short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, the quartet are part of a larger class sometimes referred to as "forever chemicals," due to their strength and failure to degrade in the environment. Thousands of drinking water utilities across the country likely have PFOA or PFOS in their system above the EPA's new advisories. AFFF lawsuits have linked the chemicals to serious health effects like cancer, low birthweight babies, and immune system effects."

These PFAS compounds, present in firefighting foam, have been linked to water contamination, as they infiltrate soil and groundwater, posing a long-lasting threat to aquatic life and local communities. Moreover, PFAS can accumulate in the food chain, potentially reaching humans and causing health issues such as developmental problems, immune system suppression, and even certain cancers. The deployment of firefighting foam during military exercises or emergencies can lead to the unintentional release of PFAS into the environment. Cleanup efforts become complex and costly, as conventional methods struggle to completely remove these persistent chemicals from soil and water sources. Addressing this issue requires a shift towards alternative firefighting agents that are effective yet environmentally benign. The military must prioritize research and development of PFAS-free firefighting solutions to mitigate the negative consequences associated with the use of firefighting foam. This shift would not only safeguard ecosystems and public health but also demonstrate responsible stewardship of natural resources by the military.

One promising alternative to using firefighting foam by the military is the adoption of high-pressure water systems for fire suppression. These systems utilize powerful jets of water to rapidly cool and extinguish fires. By avoiding the use of foam containing harmful PFAS compounds, high-pressure water systems significantly reduce the risk of environmental contamination and potential health hazards. This solution not only mitigates the ecological impact but also ensures the safety of military personnel and nearby communities. Another viable option is the use of gel-based fire suppressants. These gels create a thick, cooling barrier on the surface of the fire, preventing oxygen from reaching the flames and extinguishing them. These gels are often biodegradable and environmentally friendly, addressing concerns about long-term soil and water contamination. By incorporating such alternatives, the military can demonstrate its commitment to responsible fire management practices while safeguarding the well-being of both ecosystems and individuals.

Information provided by AFFFLawsuitCenter.com, a website devoted to providing news about AFFF and PFAS cancer, lymphoma and leukaemia claims, including a free no-cost, no-obligation AFFF Lawsuit Claim.